Sacred Facts Ā· At a Glance
- Gender
- male
Primary Scriptures
0 sourcesNo primary scriptures are catalogued for this entry yet. If you know of scriptural references we have missed, please contribute them.
RÄma of AyodhyÄ
The city, the river, and the king who left it
This entry is about RÄma as the deity of AyodhyÄ ā that is, in the cult sense, and not only as the protagonist of the RÄmÄyaį¹a. AyodhyÄ is the city of which RÄma is RÄjÄ and the city he leaves, and the two facts are equally important to how the place is worshipped. The cult of AyodhyÄ is a cult of a departure: the ghat where the royal party embarked, the trees under which the exile is said to have rested, the nights of the leelÄ before the war, and the sites of the later darÅana of the returning RÄma. Almost none of these are events in the Valmiki text; nearly all of them are leelÄ sites of a developed local cult, and they are the substance of the pilgrimage.
The SarayÅ« is the axis. The river, its ghats, the NaimisÄraį¹ya grove where RÄma is said to have built an ashram on its bank, and the HanumÄn associations along the northern bank give the town its topography, and the RÄma-leelÄ path from the ghat to the takį¹£aÅilÄ and the RÄma JanmabhÅ«mi is the standard pilgrimage. A second, older line of association runs through the Buddhist and Jain literatures, in which AyodhyÄ is a place of pilgrimage for other reasons entirely, and this history is part of the town's meaning and not a rival to the RÄma cult.
Historically, the RÄma shrine at AyodhyÄ was destroyed, rebuilt and repeatedly altered; the site's modern history is a matter of record and should be described by date and document rather than by summary. A structure built in the medieval or early modern period stood in the leelÄ area, including a "KÄnak BhÄwan"; the courts and the executive constituted in 1949 litigated the title through the decades; the Supreme Court judgment of 2019 recognised the claim; and a temple was consecrated at the site in January 2024. This entry reports that sequence and does not adjudicate the competing claims that were made in it. For a goddess or god who is a person first, the temple is recent and the cult is old ā and the distinction should be kept visible.
Sources and what is still unverified
- RÄmÄyaį¹a (Valmiki) ā work level; the AyodhyÄ leelÄ tradition goes well beyond it.
- Padma Purana and the AyodhyÄ-mÄhÄtmya literature ā work level.
- Ayodhya District Gazetteer (Government of India gazetteer series) ā for the town, the river and the ghats.
- Unverified: the exact date and identity of the earlier "Kanak Bhawan" building, the frontmatter's "c. 500 BCEā200 CE" dating of the RÄmÄyaį¹a events, and every festival date in the frontmatter.
Sources & provenance
- šSupporting referenceOther[1, 'text', 'Ramayana (Valmiki)', '-']
- šSupporting referenceOther[1, 'text', 'Padma Purana and the Ayodhya-mahatmya literature - work level']

